<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five questions for&#8230;..William McVicker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theladyorganist.com/five-questions-for-william-mcvicker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theladyorganist.com/five-questions-for-william-mcvicker/</link>
	<description>the online magazine for organists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene T. Cranmer</title>
		<link>http://www.theladyorganist.com/five-questions-for-william-mcvicker/#comment-56143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlene T. Cranmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theladyorganist.com/?p=4091#comment-56143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a wonderful interview!  So true...  its best to get someone to listen from the pews to get pre-recital comments on the sounds that the audience will hear during the performance.  Organs always sound different from the organ bench!  I also appreciated Mr. McVickers&#039;  comments on respecting the integrity of each organ&#039;s tonal design and not trying to make it into something that it was never meant to be.  Thanks, Morwenna and Mr. McVicker!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful interview!  So true&#8230;  its best to get someone to listen from the pews to get pre-recital comments on the sounds that the audience will hear during the performance.  Organs always sound different from the organ bench!  I also appreciated Mr. McVickers&#8217;  comments on respecting the integrity of each organ&#8217;s tonal design and not trying to make it into something that it was never meant to be.  Thanks, Morwenna and Mr. McVicker!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://www.theladyorganist.com/five-questions-for-william-mcvicker/#comment-55973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marilyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theladyorganist.com/?p=4091#comment-55973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for support of Novello Bach. Whilst there is plenty scholarly thinking to admire in other editions, there is nothing like going back to what one started with. In a lot of cases, the page turns are in manageable places, and the older, larger editions are very good for their large print, good for tired eyes. One can always note any variations in the text.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for support of Novello Bach. Whilst there is plenty scholarly thinking to admire in other editions, there is nothing like going back to what one started with. In a lot of cases, the page turns are in manageable places, and the older, larger editions are very good for their large print, good for tired eyes. One can always note any variations in the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
